ÌÇÐÄTV & BAEA response – Kingdon review of children’s hearing services
ÌÇÐÄTV submitted a joint online response with BAEA to Kingdon review of children’s hearing services.
Max 300 words/sectionÌý
Question 1
The following questions refer to the review and recall of children affected by service issues in children’s audiology services. This review and recall exercise is part of NHS England’sÌýPaediatricÌýHearing Services ImprovementÌýProgramme.
Ìý
The deaf children,Ìýtheir familiesÌýand educationalÌýprovidersÌýaffected by service issues in children’s audiology services requiredÌýrapid responseÌýtargeted interventionsÌýand support from the Sensory SupportÌýServices.ÌýOnce informed of the late diagnosed children, theÌýlocal authority services could implementÌýaÌýmulti-specialist staffÌýapproach, Qualified Teachers of Deaf Children and Young People (QToD), educational audiologists, and where available teaching assistants experienced in working with deaf children,Ìýcommunication support workers,ÌýBritish Sign LanguageÌý(BSL)Ìýtutors, deaf modelsÌýto support their communication, language, social emotional and academic development.Ìý
The disjoined systemsÌýreportedÌýbetween local authority education services and health servicesÌýexperienced in some areasÌýregardingÌýmulti-ÌýdisciplinaryÌýteam meetings,ÌýimpactsÌýonÌýprinciplesÌýof families only needing to ‘tell it once’ as the education servicesÌýdon’tÌýalways have access toÌýinformationÌýin a timely manner. As reported in the annual Consortium for Research in Deaf EducationÌý(CRIDE), education services aim toÌýhave aÌýQToDÌýestablishÌýcontact within five working daysÌýof notification of a new referral that isÌýidentifiedÌýoutside the newborn hearing screeningÌý(NBHS), twoÌýworkingÌýdaysÌýif theÌýreferralÌýfrom theÌýNBHSÌýprogramme.ÌýThoseÌýinitialÌýmeetings with the family andÌýQToDÌýare often home-based and not as restricted as clinic appointmentÌýtimeframesÌýto allow theÌýfamily the safe space to ask questions, communicate their thoughts about their child’sÌýcommunication options,ÌýlifeÌýand education options etc.ÌýÌý
Ìý
The discussions for theseÌýchildren requiredÌýgreaterÌýsensitivityÌýasÌýthe familiesÌýrebuilt trust in the service providersÌýandÌýnavigatedÌýtheÌýrelatedÌýadditionalÌýimpact ofÌýtheirÌýexperiences. For example, some childrenÌýmissedÌýthe critical period for cochlear implant surgery, which is most effective when performed atÌýa young age.ÌýAdditionally,Ìýaddressing withÌýprofessionals if misdiagnosis of other needs was validÌýregardless of the diagnosis of deafness.Ìý
Ìý
Question 2Ìý
If you have any suggestions for how the NHS could improve the way it responds to issues in children’s audiology services, please set them out here. You may also want to share with us your reflections of working within or alongside children’s audiology services in the NHS.ÌýÌý
Ìý
ÌÇÐÄTVÌýwelcomed theÌýdevelopment of universalÌýNBHSÌýin the UKÌýwhichÌýstemmed from the seminalÌýpaper byÌýYoshinago-Itano et alÌý(1998)Ìýthat found that deaf children diagnosedÌýwithÌýtargeted intervention in place within 2 months of diagnosis had betterÌýlong-termÌýoutcomes.ÌýSimilarly, ÌÇÐÄTV promoted evidence-basedÌýresearch in the intervening years, which led to quality standards and good practice guidance around effective joint working practicesÌýegÌýFamily-CentredÌýEarly Intervention (FCEI) principles and NDCS (2024),ÌýBest Practices in FamilyÌýCentredÌýEarly Intervention forÌýChildren who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, Moeller et al,Ìý(2013),ÌýEarly Years Support for Children with a Hearing LossÌý(NDCS),ÌýQuality Standards inÌýPaediatricÌýAudiologyÌý(BAA).Ìý
Ìý
Multi-disciplinary working is fundamental toÌýhigh qualityÌýprovisionÌýacross all servicesÌýandÌýachievingÌýbetter outcomes for deaf babies,ÌýchildrenÌýand their families.ÌýTheÌýQToDÌýand Educational Audiologist interventions inputÌýat theÌýearly stagesÌýto support the family on the journey and provide information forÌýinformed decision-makingÌýis essential in the multi-disciplinary team.ÌýAnnual CRIDEÌýreports haveÌýevidencedÌýfrom the stage of identification, theÌýtimeframeÌýof first contact fromÌýQToDsÌýas specialist professionals that align with early intervention principles.ÌýÌý
Ìý
ÌÇÐÄTVÌýrecognisesÌýsome children may become deaf post NBHS and would welcome the review of the newborn and school screenings that are scheduledÌýforÌý2024/2025.Ìý
Ìý
ÌÇÐÄTV recommendsÌýan expectedÌýengagementÌýof the Children’s Hearing Service WorkingÌýGroupÌýÌý(CHSWG)Ìýas a forumÌýtoÌýmaintainÌýand nurtureÌýcollaboration, comprehensive support, and family-centredÌýpracticesÌýwith strong representation from both regional and national services, charities,ÌýparentsÌýand other stakeholders. SomeÌýCHSWGs canÌýdemonstrateÌýtheir activityÌýrelatingÌýtoÌývariations in service provisionÌýegÌýassessment of children with complex needs,Ìýmanagement of temporary deafness,ÌýreducingÌýwaiting times for routine first assessments and hearing aid reviews, improving experiences for the deaf child and their families.Ìý
Ìý